Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Acta Paediatr ; 111(5): 1034-1038, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35178741

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate the prevalence of infections by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other respiratory viruses among children admitted to paediatric emergency departments (PEDs). METHODS: From April to July 2020, a prospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted in the PEDs of eight French university hospitals. Regardless of the reason for admission, a nasopharyngeal swab sample from each child was screened using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction tests for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses. We determined the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses and identified risk factors associated with a positive test. RESULTS: Of the 924 included children (median [interquartile range] age: 4 years [1-9]; boys: 55%), 908 (98.3%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Only three samples were positive (0.3%; 95% confidence interval: 0.1-1) and none of these children had symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019. Of the 836 samples (90%) tested for other viruses, 129 (15.4%) were positive (primarily rhinovirus). Respiratory viruses were significantly more common in young children and in children with respiratory tract symptoms and fever. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among children admitted to emergency departments was low. In contrast, and despite social distancing and other protective measures, the prevalence of other respiratory viruses detection was high.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Virus , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 56(12): 3802-3812, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34516722

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospitalization for infants but its economic burden is not well documented. Our objective was to describe the clinical evolution and to assess the 1-month cost of a first episode of acute bronchiolitis presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Our study was an epidemiologic analysis and a cost study of the cohort drawn from the clinical trial GUERANDE, conducted in 24 French pediatric EDs. Infants of 6 weeks to 12 months of age presenting at pediatric EDs with a first episode of bronchiolitis were eligible. The costs considered were collected from a societal viewpoint, according to the recommendations of the French National Health Authority. RESULTS: A total of 777 infants were included with a median age of 4 months. A total of 57% were hospitalized during the month following the first consultation in the ED, including 28 (3.6%) in an intensive care unit. The mean length of stay was 4.2 days (SD = 3.7). The average time to relief of all symptoms was 13 days (SD = 7). Average total cost per patient was €1919 (95% confidence interval: 1756-2138) from a societal perspective, mostly due to hospitalization cost. The estimated annual cost of bronchiolitis in infants was evaluated to be between €160 and €273 million in France. DISCUSSION: Bronchiolitis represent a high cost for the health care system and broadly for society, with hospitalizations costs being the main cost driver. Thus significant investments should be made to develop innovative therapies, to reduce the number of hospitalizations and length of stay.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis , Bronquiolitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Bronquiolitis/epidemiología , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante
3.
EBioMedicine ; 70: 103495, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34304047

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children are underrepresented in the COVID-19 pandemic and often experience milder disease than adolescents and adults. Reduced severity is possibly due to recent and more frequent seasonal human coronaviruses (HCoV) infections. We assessed the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal HCoV specific antibodies in a large cohort in north-eastern France. METHODS: In this cross-sectional seroprevalence study, serum samples were collected from children and adults requiring hospital admission for non-COVID-19 between February and August 2020. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal HCoV (229E, HKU1, NL63, OC43) were assessed using a bead-based multiplex assay, Luciferase-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay, and a pseudotype neutralisation assay. FINDINGS: In 2,408 individuals, seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies was 7-8% with three different immunoassays. Antibody levels to seasonal HCoV increased substantially up to the age of 10. Antibody responses in SARS-CoV-2 seropositive individuals were lowest in adults 18-30 years. In SARS-CoV-2 seronegative individuals, we observed cross-reactivity between antibodies to the four HCoV and SARS-CoV-2 Spike. In contrast to other antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, specific antibodies to sub-unit 2 of Spike (S2) in seronegative samples were highest in children. Upon infection with SARS-CoV-2, antibody levels to Spike of betacoronavirus OC43 increased across the whole age spectrum. No SARS-CoV-2 seropositive individuals with low levels of antibodies to seasonal HCoV were observed. INTERPRETATION: Our findings underline significant cross-reactivity between antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal HCoV, but provide no significant evidence for cross-protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection due to a recent seasonal HCoV infection. In particular, across all age groups we did not observe SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals with low levels of antibodies to seasonal HCoV. FUNDING: This work was supported by the « URGENCE COVID-19 ¼ fundraising campaign of Institut Pasteur, by the French Government's Investissement d'Avenir program, Laboratoire d'Excellence Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases (Grant No. ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID), and by the REACTing (Research & Action Emerging Infectious Diseases), and by the RECOVER project funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 101003589, and by a grant from LabEx IBEID (ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/inmunología , Inmunidad Humoral/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Reacciones Cruzadas/inmunología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias/prevención & control , Estaciones del Año , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Adulto Joven
4.
Rech Soins Infirm ; 137(2): 62-76, 2019 06.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31453674

RESUMEN

Context : Since 2006, all students in healthcare, including student nurses, follow an emergency care curriculum. This curriculum uses simulation, which can be psychologically harmful to students. Objective : this study explores tutors' strategies to establish and maintain students' psychological safety during the emergency care simulations. Method : A qualitative study was conducted within an exploratory framework. Qualitative data were collected by semi-structured interviews. The sample subjects were emergency care tutors. Results : The tutors identified risk factors affecting the students' psychological wellbeing during simulations. Having assessed these risks, tutors deploy prevention strategies. When a student is in psychological distress, they implement several remedial tools. These strategies intervene at the three stages of the simulation : the briefing, the scenario, and the debriefing. Discussion : The importance of psychological risks for students must be taken into consideration by the tutors in simulation. Those risks must be anticipated from the design to the execution of simulation sessions. Conclusion : The management of students in psychological distress should be better addressed in the tutors' own training.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Urgencia/educación , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Curriculum , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa
5.
Pediatr Res ; 82(6): 979-985, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28665930

RESUMEN

BackgroundBeing aware of the impact of low birth weight on late-onset hypertension, our aim was to describe systolic blood pressure (sBP) and renal function in 3-5-year-old preterm-born children and to determine which perinatal factors or childhood factors were associated with an altered renal function at 5 years in these children.MethodsThis was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of children born at 27-31 weeks of gestation and included at birth and examined at 3, 4, and 5 years of age. The primary outcome was renal function at 5 years: BP, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and albuminuria.ResultsOne hundred and sixty five children were examined, of whom 93 (56.4%) were male. Gestational age was 29.2±1.4 weeks and birth weight was 1,217±331 g. Overall, 25% children had sBP ≥90th percentile at age 3 and 4 years and 11% at 5 years. In multivariate analysis, sBP ≥90th percentile at 5 years was associated with the use of antenatal steroids (OR=0.19(0.05;0.65)). There was a significant association between protein intake on day 28 and sBP at 5 years (ß=2.1±1.0, P=0.03). Glomerular filtration rate at 5 years was significantly decreased in case of hyaline membrane disease or necrotizing enterocolitis. High urine albumin was not predictable from one year to another.ConclusionIn preterm-born children, sBP was often high and neonatal protein intake was associated with increased blood pressure during childhood.


Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Riñón/fisiopatología , Nacimiento Prematuro , Albuminuria/diagnóstico , Antropometría , Preescolar , Femenino , Crecimiento , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Estudios Prospectivos
6.
JAMA Pediatr ; 171(8): e171333, 2017 08 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28586918

RESUMEN

Importance: Acute bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospitalization among infants. Previous studies, underpowered to examine hospital admission, have found a limited benefit of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) treatment in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Objective: To examine whether HS nebulization treatment would decrease the hospital admission rate among infants with a first episode of acute bronchiolitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Efficacy of 3% Hypertonic Saline in Acute Viral Bronchiolitis (GUERANDE) study was a multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial on 2 parallel groups conducted during 2 bronchiolitis seasons (October through March) from October 15, 2012, through April 15, 2014, at 24 French pediatric EDs. Among the 2445 infants (6 weeks to 12 months of age) assessed for inclusion, 777 with a first episode of acute bronchiolitis with respiratory distress and no chronic medical condition were included. Interventions: Two 20-minute nebulization treatments of 4 mL of HS, 3%, or 4 mL of normal saline (NS), 0.9%, given 20 minutes apart. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital admission rate in the 24 hours after enrollment. Results: Of the 777 infants included in the study (median age, 3 months; interquartile range, 2-5 months; 468 [60.2%] male), 385 (49.5%) were randomized to the HS group and 387 (49.8%) to the NS group (5 patients did not receive treatment). By 24 hours, 185 of 385 infants (48.1%) in the HS group were admitted compared with 202 of 387 infants (52.2%) in the NS group. The risk difference for hospitalizations was not significant according to the mixed-effects regression model (adjusted risk difference, -3.2%; 95% CI, -8.7% to 2.2%; P = .25). The mean (SD) Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument score improvement was greater in the HS group (-3.1 [3.2]) than in the NS group (-2.4 [3.3]) (adjusted difference, -0.7; 95% CI, -1.2 to -0.2; P = .006) and similarly for the Respiratory Assessment Change Score. Mild adverse events, such as worsening of cough, occurred more frequently among children in the HS group (35 of 392 [8.9%]) than among those in the NS group (15 of 384 [3.9%]) (risk difference, 5.0%; 95% CI, 1.6%-8.4%; P = .005), with no serious adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: Nebulized HS treatment did not significantly reduce the rate of hospital admissions among infants with a first episode of acute moderate to severe bronchiolitis who were admitted to the pediatric ED relative to NS, but mild adverse events were more frequent in the HS group. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01777347.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Niño Hospitalizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Solución Salina Hipertónica/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Aguda , Administración por Inhalación , Método Doble Ciego , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Salud del Lactante , Masculino , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Pediatr ; 188: 252-257.e6, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28456389

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop a reliable and validated tool to evaluate technical resuscitation skills in a pediatric simulation setting. STUDY DESIGN: Four Resuscitation and Emergency Simulation Checklist for Assessment in Pediatrics (RESCAPE) evaluation tools were created, following international guidelines: intraosseous needle insertion, bag mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation, and cardiac massage. We applied a modified Delphi methodology evaluation to binary rating items. Reliability was assessed comparing the ratings of 2 observers (1 in real time and 1 after a video-recorded review). The tools were assessed for content, construct, and criterion validity, and for sensitivity to change. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability, evaluated with Cohen kappa coefficients, was perfect or near-perfect (>0.8) for 92.5% of items and each Cronbach alpha coefficient was ≥0.91. Principal component analyses showed that all 4 tools were unidimensional. Significant increases in median scores with increasing levels of medical expertise were demonstrated for RESCAPE-intraosseous needle insertion (P = .0002), RESCAPE-bag mask ventilation (P = .0002), RESCAPE-endotracheal intubation (P = .0001), and RESCAPE-cardiac massage (P = .0037). Significantly increased median scores over time were also demonstrated during a simulation-based educational program. CONCLUSIONS: RESCAPE tools are reliable and validated tools for the evaluation of technical resuscitation skills in pediatric settings during simulation-based educational programs. They might also be used for medical practice performance evaluations.


Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Pediatría/educación , Resucitación/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Técnica Delphi , Evaluación Educacional , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Intubación Intratraqueal , Masculino , Maniquíes , Pediatras , Análisis de Componente Principal , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudiantes de Medicina , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...